49 CT, MM, FL 33027

Parcel: 514035121540 · 01 · Zoning:

Assessed Value (2026)
$199,310

Property Details

Year Built
2004
Lot Sqft
3,427

Sales History

1
$4,775,400
2000-10-03
2
$177,900-96%
2003-06-23

Tax Assessment History

$199,310
Assessed (2026)
$461,020
Market Value
$149,310
Taxable Value
$3,040
Annual Tax
2025
$369,912
$0
2026
$199,310
$461,020
Assessed Market
View detailed table
YearAssessedMarketTaxableTax
2026 $199,310 $461,020 $149,310 $3,040
2025 $369,912 $ $143,510 $2,922

About 49 CT, MM, FL 33027

49 CT, MM, FL 33027 is a property built in 2004 on a 3,427 square foot lot. The property is currently owned by CONTRERAS,GREGORIA H/E MARTINEZ,MAGNASET, recorded as of 2026-04-26. The owner appears to be owner-occupied based on the mailing address matching the property address.

The most recent sale was on 2003-06-23 for $177,900. The property sold for $4,597,500 less than the prior sale of $4,775,400 on 2000-10-03. The 2026 assessed value is $199,310 with a market value of $461,020.

This breaks down to $48,120 for the land and $412,900 for the building. The assessed value decreased 46% from $369,912 in 2025. 49 CT, MM, FL 33027 is located in MM, Florida.

Property records, tax assessments, sales history, and ownership information for this MM property are sourced from broward County public records. The complete ownership history of this property spans from 2000 to 2003, with 2 recorded transactions in the public record. The current assessed value represents 112% of the most recent sale price..

Current Owner

CONTRERAS,GREGORIA H/E MARTINEZ,MAGNASET
12749 SW 49 CT, MIRAMAR, FL, 33027
Since: 2026-04-26
View owner profile →

Est. Annual Insurance

$1,900 — $3,800
Flood $400 — $800
Property/Wind $1,500 — $3,000

Estimate based on FEMA flood zone, property value, and year built. Actual premiums vary based on elevation, mitigation features, roof condition, and insurer. Not a quote.

Neighborhood 33027

78.8%
Owner-Occ
21.2%
Investor
312
Flips (4yr)
4,541
New Biz (3yr)
Distress Risk
ELEVATED
56
View full risk analysis →