99 CIR, PL, FL 33324

Parcel: 504105210624 · 01 · Zoning:

Assessed Value (2026)
$294,230

Property Details

Year Built
1989
Lot Sqft
1,164

Sales History

1
$176,000
2007-10-25
2
$170,000-3%
2014-06-20
3
$100non-market transfer
2018-09-10

Tax Assessment History

$294,230
Assessed (2026)
$337,050
Market Value
$294,230
Taxable Value
$5,990
Annual Tax
2025
$581,007
$0
2026
$294,230
$337,050
Assessed Market
View detailed table
YearAssessedMarketTaxableTax
2026 $294,230 $337,050 $294,230 $5,990
2025 $581,007 $ $267,490 $5,446

About 99 CIR, PL, FL 33324

99 CIR, PL, FL 33324 is a property built in 1989 on a 1,164 square foot lot. The property is currently owned by CABALLERO,SYLVIA EVELYN C DE, recorded as of 2026-03-30. The mailing address differs from the property address, suggesting this may be an investment property or rental.

The most recent sale was on 2018-09-10 for $100. The property sold for $169,900 less than the prior sale of $170,000 on 2014-06-20. There are 3 recorded sales for this property.

The 2026 assessed value is $294,230 with a market value of $337,050. This breaks down to $23,280 for the land and $313,770 for the building. The assessed value decreased 49% from $581,007 in 2025.

99 CIR, PL, FL 33324 is located in PL, Florida. Property records, tax assessments, sales history, and ownership information for this PL property are sourced from broward County public records. The complete ownership history of this property spans from 2007 to 2018, with 3 recorded transactions in the public record..

Current Owner

CABALLERO,SYLVIA EVELYN C DE
2496 CENTERGATE DR #108, MIRAMAR, FL, 33025
Since: 2026-03-30
View owner profile →

Est. Annual Insurance

$3,195 — $5,831
Flood $400 — $800
Property/Wind $2,795 — $5,031

Estimate based on FEMA flood zone, property value, and year built. Actual premiums vary based on elevation, mitigation features, roof condition, and insurer. Not a quote.

Neighborhood 33324

56.5%
Owner-Occ
43.5%
Investor
236
Flips (4yr)
6,499
New Biz (3yr)
Distress Risk
ELEVATED
56
View full risk analysis →