COMMERCIAL BLVD, FL, FL 33308

Parcel: 494213071460 · 23 · Zoning:

Assessed Value (2026)
$124,680

Property Details

Year Built
2005
Lot Sqft
3,500

Sales History

1
$100non-market transfer
2011-07-30
2
$100non-market transfer
2013-09-05
3
$100non-market transfer
2017-03-16

Tax Assessment History

$124,680
Assessed (2026)
$124,680
Market Value
$124,680
Taxable Value
$2,538
Annual Tax
2025
$255,979
$0
2026
$124,680
Assessed Market
View detailed table
YearAssessedMarketTaxableTax
2026 $124,680 $124,680 $124,680 $2,538
2025 $255,979 $ $124,680 $2,538

About COMMERCIAL BLVD, FL, FL 33308

COMMERCIAL BLVD, FL, FL 33308 is a property built in 2005 on a 3,500 square foot lot. The property is currently owned by MARTIN,MICHAEL BENEDICT KRENIK,MARY LISA MARTIN, recorded as of 2026-04-26. The mailing address differs from the property address, suggesting this may be an investment property or rental.

The most recent sale was on 2017-03-16 for $100. There are 3 recorded sales for this property. The 2026 assessed value is $124,680 with a market value of $124,680.

This breaks down to $84,000 for the land and $40,680 for the building. The assessed value decreased 51% from $255,979 in 2025. COMMERCIAL BLVD, FL, FL 33308 is located in FL, Florida.

Property records, tax assessments, sales history, and ownership information for this FL property are sourced from broward County public records. The complete ownership history of this property spans from 2011 to 2017, with 3 recorded transactions in the public record..

Current Owner

MARTIN,MICHAEL BENEDICT KRENIK,MARY LISA MARTIN
23 IRON BARK WAY, IRVINE, CA, 92612
Since: 2026-04-26
View owner profile →

Est. Annual Insurance

$1,900 — $3,800
Flood $400 — $800
Property/Wind $1,500 — $3,000

Estimate based on FEMA flood zone, property value, and year built. Actual premiums vary based on elevation, mitigation features, roof condition, and insurer. Not a quote.

Neighborhood 33308

68.9%
Owner-Occ
31.1%
Investor
217
Flips (4yr)
4,695
New Biz (3yr)
Distress Risk
ELEVATED
56
View full risk analysis →