65 CT, FL, FL 333081054

Parcel: 494212110010 · 01 · Zoning:

Assessed Value (2026)
$430,230

Property Details

Year Built
1976
Lot Sqft
9,423

Sales History

1
$100non-market transfer
2002-04-17
2
$575,000
2004-12-01
3
$100non-market transfer
2024-05-17

Tax Assessment History

$430,230
Assessed (2026)
$806,540
Market Value
$380,230
Taxable Value
$7,741
Annual Tax
2025
$770,659
$0
2026
$430,230
$806,540
Assessed Market
View detailed table
YearAssessedMarketTaxableTax
2026 $430,230 $806,540 $380,230 $7,741
2025 $770,659 $ $367,700 $7,486

About 65 CT, FL, FL 333081054

65 CT, FL, FL 333081054 is a property built in 1976 on a 9,423 square foot lot. The property is currently owned by CRUZPINO,RUBEN & EVELYN, recorded as of 2026-03-30. The owner appears to be owner-occupied based on the mailing address matching the property address.

The most recent sale was on 2024-05-17 for $100. The property sold for $574,900 less than the prior sale of $575,000 on 2004-12-01. There are 3 recorded sales for this property.

The 2026 assessed value is $430,230 with a market value of $806,540. This breaks down to $203,540 for the land and $603,000 for the building. The assessed value decreased 44% from $770,659 in 2025.

65 CT, FL, FL 333081054 is located in FL, Florida. Property records, tax assessments, sales history, and ownership information for this FL property are sourced from broward County public records. The complete ownership history of this property spans from 2002 to 2024, with 3 recorded transactions in the public record..

Current Owner

CRUZPINO,RUBEN & EVELYN
1841 NE 65 CT, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL, 33308
Since: 2026-03-30
View owner profile →

Est. Annual Insurance

$4,487 — $8,156
Flood $400 — $800
Property/Wind $4,087 — $7,356

Estimate based on FEMA flood zone, property value, and year built. Actual premiums vary based on elevation, mitigation features, roof condition, and insurer. Not a quote.

Neighborhood 33308

68.9%
Owner-Occ
31.1%
Investor
217
Flips (4yr)
4,695
New Biz (3yr)
Distress Risk
ELEVATED
56
View full risk analysis →