LAGOS DE CAMPO BLVD, TM, FL 33321

Parcel: 494109460160 · 01 · Zoning:

Assessed Value (2026)
$112,250

Property Details

Year Built
2005
Lot Sqft
800

Sales History

1
$315,000
2001-10-01
2
$145,000-54%
2003-12-15

Tax Assessment History

$112,250
Assessed (2026)
$271,050
Market Value
$62,250
Taxable Value
$1,267
Annual Tax
2025
$228,857
$0
2026
$112,250
$271,050
Assessed Market
View detailed table
YearAssessedMarketTaxableTax
2026 $112,250 $271,050 $62,250 $1,267
2025 $228,857 $ $58,990 $1,201

About LAGOS DE CAMPO BLVD, TM, FL 33321

LAGOS DE CAMPO BLVD, TM, FL 33321 is a property built in 2005 on a 800 square foot lot. The property is currently owned by MOISE,CRISTIAN & SANDY, recorded as of 2026-03-30. The owner appears to be owner-occupied based on the mailing address matching the property address.

The most recent sale was on 2003-12-15 for $145,000. The property sold for $170,000 less than the prior sale of $315,000 on 2001-10-01. The 2026 assessed value is $112,250 with a market value of $271,050.

This breaks down to $8,000 for the land and $263,050 for the building. The assessed value decreased 51% from $228,857 in 2025. LAGOS DE CAMPO BLVD, TM, FL 33321 is located in TM, Florida.

Property records, tax assessments, sales history, and ownership information for this TM property are sourced from broward County public records. The complete ownership history of this property spans from 2001 to 2003, with 2 recorded transactions in the public record. The current assessed value represents 77% of the most recent sale price..

Current Owner

MOISE,CRISTIAN & SANDY
8468 LAGOS DE CAMPO BLVD, TAMARAC, FL, 33321
Since: 2026-03-30
View owner profile →

Est. Annual Insurance

$1,900 — $3,800
Flood $400 — $800
Property/Wind $1,500 — $3,000

Estimate based on FEMA flood zone, property value, and year built. Actual premiums vary based on elevation, mitigation features, roof condition, and insurer. Not a quote.

Neighborhood 33321

74.4%
Owner-Occ
25.6%
Investor
340
Flips (4yr)
4,721
New Biz (3yr)
Distress Risk
ELEVATED
56
View full risk analysis →